Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

From: Byungchul Park
Date: Mon Jan 25 2016 - 02:25:32 EST

On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 10:14:44AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> So the reason I didn't mark them for stable is that they were non
> trivial, however they've been in for a while now and nothing broke, so I
> suppose backporting them isn't a problem.


What do you think about the way to solve this oops problem? Could you just
give your opinion of the way? Or ack or nack about this backporting?