Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over udelay"

From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Mon Jan 25 2016 - 04:16:19 EST

Next message: Johannes Thumshirn: "Re: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/emcctd: drivers/scsi/emcctd: Client driver implementation for EMC-Symmetrix GuestOS emulated Cut-Through Device"
Previous message: Feng Wu: "[PATCH v4 1/4] KVM: Recover IRTE to remapped mode if the interrupt is not single-destination"
In reply to: Sudip Mukherjee: "Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over udelay""
Next in thread: Dan Carpenter: "Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over udelay""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ugh... Checkpatch told us to introduce bugs... :( We almost certainly
would have missed this bug in review, but it wasn't sent to the list so
I guess we'll never know.

regards,
dan carpenter

Next message: Johannes Thumshirn: "Re: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/emcctd: drivers/scsi/emcctd: Client driver implementation for EMC-Symmetrix GuestOS emulated Cut-Through Device"
Previous message: Feng Wu: "[PATCH v4 1/4] KVM: Recover IRTE to remapped mode if the interrupt is not single-destination"
In reply to: Sudip Mukherjee: "Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over udelay""
Next in thread: Dan Carpenter: "Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over udelay""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]