Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] usb: host: ehci-sched: cleanup

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:52:52PM -0300, Geyslan G. Bem wrote:
> 2016-01-25 0:30 GMT-03:00 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 01:03:39PM -0300, Geyslan G. Bem wrote:
> >> 2015-12-13 13:59 GMT-03:00 Geyslan G. Bem <geyslan@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >> >
> >> > Cleanup done with the help of coccinelle, checkpatch and cppcheck tools.
> >> >
> >> > Geyslan G. Bem (10):
> >> >   usb: host: ehci-sched: refactor scan_isoc function
> >> >   usb: host: ehci-sched: move constants to right
> >> >   usb: host: ehci-sched: remove useless initializations
> >> >   usb: host: ehci-sched: add spaces around operators
> >> >   usb: host: ehci-sched: remove prohibited spaces
> >> >   usb: host: ehci-sched: remove useless else branch
> >> >   usb: host: ehci-sched: use C89-style comments
> >> >   usb: host: ehci-sched: add line after declarations
> >> >   usb: host: ehci-sched: use sizeof operator with parens
> >> >   usb: host: ehci-sched: remove unnecessary braces
> >> >
> >> >  drivers/usb/host/ehci-sched.c | 522 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> >> >  1 file changed, 261 insertions(+), 261 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > 2.6.3
> >> >
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Disturbing eggnogs... :-)
> >>
> >> This bunch will be applied?
> >
> > Ok, I tried to dig through all of these, but I have over 50+ emails from
> > you, and it's not quite obvious which ones should be applied, and which
> > are superseaded by a new series.  So can you just send me all of your
> > outstanding patches, in one series, with all of the accumulated (if any)
> > acks you have gotten for them, so that I can queue them up?  That will
> > make my life much easier.
> 
> Ok Greg, there was three patchset versions for this file that would
> count over 40+ emails. This is v3. I didn't find any answer with ack
> for it.

But you had sent other series as well, please resend _everything_.

> About sending, there's no problem, I'm here trying to help :-) but in
> order to not increase the noise that I have created I would like to
> wait Alan's answer.
> 
> Alan, could you please analyze this?

Don't wait for someone, you can just resend it all, that's fine.

thanks,

greg k-h