Re: [PATCH] power: APM_EMULATION does not depend on PM

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, January 25, 2016 04:48:28 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The APM emulation code does multiple things, and some of them depend on
> PM_SLEEP, while the battery management does not. However, selecting
> the symbol like SHARPSL_PM does causes a Kconfig warning:
> 
> warning: (SHARPSL_PM && PMAC_APM_EMU) selects APM_EMULATION which has unmet direct dependencies (PM && SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION)
> 
> From all I can tell, this is completely harmless, and we can simply allow
> APM_EMULATION to be enabled here, even if PM is not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>

Applied, thanks!

Rafael