Re: [mpt3sas driver 02/10] mpt3sas: Used IEEE SGL instead of MPI SGL while framing a SMP Passthrough request message.

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Thu Jan 28 2016 - 04:16:29 EST

Next message: Christian Borntraeger: "Regression: 4.5-rc1 (bisect: hugetlb: make mm and fs code explicitly non-modular vs CONFIG_TIMER_STATS)"
Previous message: Sudip Mukherjee: "[PATCH] mm: provide reference to READ_IMPLIES_EXEC"
In reply to: Suganath prabu Subaramani: "[mpt3sas driver 02/10] mpt3sas: Used IEEE SGL instead of MPI SGL while framing a SMP Passthrough request message."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:06:59PM +0530, Suganath prabu Subaramani wrote:
> From: Suganath prabu Subramani <suganath-prabu.subramani@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> As driver was using MPI SGL while framing the SMP Passthrough request
> message due to which firmware unable to post the Reply Data in the host
> memory and timeout is observed for this SMP Passthrough request message
> and so unable to perform phy disable operation.

Does this also do the right thing for MPT2 HBAs?

Next message: Christian Borntraeger: "Regression: 4.5-rc1 (bisect: hugetlb: make mm and fs code explicitly non-modular vs CONFIG_TIMER_STATS)"
Previous message: Sudip Mukherjee: "[PATCH] mm: provide reference to READ_IMPLIES_EXEC"
In reply to: Suganath prabu Subaramani: "[mpt3sas driver 02/10] mpt3sas: Used IEEE SGL instead of MPI SGL while framing a SMP Passthrough request message."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]