[GIT pull] scheduler updates for 4.5

[Thomas Gleixner]

Linus,

please pull the latest sched-urgent-for-linus git tree from:

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git sched-urgent-for-linus

Three small fixes in the scheduler/core
      - Use after free in the numa code
      - Crash in the numa init code
      - A simple spelling fix

Thanks,

	tglx

------------------>
Gavin Guo (1):
      sched/numa: Fix use-after-free bug in the task_numa_compare

Raghavendra K T (1):
      sched: Fix crash in sched_init_numa()

Zhen Lei (1):
      pid: Fix spelling in comments


 kernel/pid.c        |  2 +-
 kernel/sched/core.c |  2 +-
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c
index 78b3d9f80d44..e793d091f680 100644
--- a/kernel/pid.c
+++ b/kernel/pid.c
@@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ void __init pidhash_init(void)
 
 void __init pidmap_init(void)
 {
-	/* Veryify no one has done anything silly */
+	/* Verify no one has done anything silly: */
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(PID_MAX_LIMIT >= PIDNS_HASH_ADDING);
 
 	/* bump default and minimum pid_max based on number of cpus */
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 44253adb3c36..474658b51fe6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6840,7 +6840,7 @@ static void sched_init_numa(void)
 
 			sched_domains_numa_masks[i][j] = mask;
 
-			for (k = 0; k < nr_node_ids; k++) {
+			for_each_node(k) {
 				if (node_distance(j, k) > sched_domains_numa_distance[i])
 					continue;
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 1926606ece80..56b7d4b83947 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1220,8 +1220,6 @@ static void task_numa_assign(struct task_numa_env *env,
 {
 	if (env->best_task)
 		put_task_struct(env->best_task);
-	if (p)
-		get_task_struct(p);
 
 	env->best_task = p;
 	env->best_imp = imp;
@@ -1289,20 +1287,30 @@ static void task_numa_compare(struct task_numa_env *env,
 	long imp = env->p->numa_group ? groupimp : taskimp;
 	long moveimp = imp;
 	int dist = env->dist;
+	bool assigned = false;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irq(&dst_rq->lock);
 	cur = dst_rq->curr;
 	/*
-	 * No need to move the exiting task, and this ensures that ->curr
-	 * wasn't reaped and thus get_task_struct() in task_numa_assign()
-	 * is safe under RCU read lock.
-	 * Note that rcu_read_lock() itself can't protect from the final
-	 * put_task_struct() after the last schedule().
+	 * No need to move the exiting task or idle task.
 	 */
 	if ((cur->flags & PF_EXITING) || is_idle_task(cur))
 		cur = NULL;
+	else {
+		/*
+		 * The task_struct must be protected here to protect the
+		 * p->numa_faults access in the task_weight since the
+		 * numa_faults could already be freed in the following path:
+		 * finish_task_switch()
+		 *     --> put_task_struct()
+		 *         --> __put_task_struct()
+		 *             --> task_numa_free()
+		 */
+		get_task_struct(cur);
+	}
+
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&dst_rq->lock);
 
 	/*
@@ -1386,6 +1394,7 @@ balance:
 		 */
 		if (!load_too_imbalanced(src_load, dst_load, env)) {
 			imp = moveimp - 1;
+			put_task_struct(cur);
 			cur = NULL;
 			goto assign;
 		}
@@ -1411,9 +1420,16 @@ balance:
 		env->dst_cpu = select_idle_sibling(env->p, env->dst_cpu);
 
 assign:
+	assigned = true;
 	task_numa_assign(env, cur, imp);
 unlock:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
+	/*
+	 * The dst_rq->curr isn't assigned. The protection for task_struct is
+	 * finished.
+	 */
+	if (cur && !assigned)
+		put_task_struct(cur);
 }
 
 static void task_numa_find_cpu(struct task_numa_env *env,