Re: [PATCH 1/4] Add BUG_XX() debugging options
From: Jeffrey Merkey
Date: Mon Feb 01 2016 - 15:36:24 EST
On 2/1/16, Jeffrey Merkey <jeffmerkey@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2/1/16, kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Jeffrey,
>>
>> [auto build test WARNING on v4.5-rc2]
>> [also build test WARNING on next-20160201]
>> [cannot apply to tip/x86/core]
>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to
>> help improving the system]
>>
>> url:
>> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jeffrey-Merkey/Add-BUG_XX-debugging-options/20160202-040506
>> config: x86_64-randconfig-x012-201605 (attached as .config)
>> reproduce:
>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>> make ARCH=x86_64
>>
>> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>> In file included from include/linux/bug.h:4:0,
>> from include/linux/page-flags.h:9,
>> from kernel/bounds.c:9:
>>>> arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:14:5: warning: "CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG" is not
>>>> defined [-Wundef]
>> #if CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG
>> ^
>> --
>> In file included from include/linux/bug.h:4:0,
>> from include/linux/page-flags.h:9,
>> from kernel/bounds.c:9:
>>>> arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:14:5: warning: "CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG" is not
>>>> defined [-Wundef]
>> #if CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG
>> ^
>> In file included from include/linux/bug.h:4:0,
>> from include/linux/crypto.h:23,
>> from arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c:8:
>>>> arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:14:5: warning: "CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG" is not
>>>> defined [-Wundef]
>> #if CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG
>> ^
>>
>> vim +/CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG +14 arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h
>>
>> 1 #ifndef _ASM_X86_BUG_H
>> 2 #define _ASM_X86_BUG_H
>> 3
>> 4 #define HAVE_ARCH_BUG
>> 5
>> 6 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
>> 7
>> 8 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
>> 9 # define __BUG_C0 "2:\t.long 1b, %c0\n"
>> 10 #else
>> 11 # define __BUG_C0 "2:\t.long 1b - 2b, %c0 - 2b\n"
>> 12 #endif
>> 13
>> > 14 #if CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG
>> 15 #define BUG() \
>> 16 do { \
>> 17 asm volatile("int3"); \
>> 18 unreachable(); \
>> 19 } while (0)
>> 20 #else
>> 21 #define BUG() \
>> 22 do { \
>>
>> ---
>> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology
>> Center
>> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel
>> Corporation
>>
>
>
> I am looking at this one, but I'm not sure what the point is of
> running a test to build something where the defines are ignored. Is
> this file off limits to use CONFIG options in the build?
>
> Jeff
>
Never mind. I just found it. LOL
:-)
Jeff