Re: Isn't 4.4 long term stable?

From: Holger Hoffstätte
Date: Tue Feb 02 2016 - 12:04:46 EST

Next message: Dan Streetman: "Re: [PATCH] nbd: ratelimit error msgs after socket close"
Previous message: Al Viro: "Re: [PATCH] kernel/fork.c: use sizeof() instead of sizeof"
In reply to: Ani Sinha: "Isn't 4.4 long term stable?"
Next in thread: Greg Kroah-Hartman: "Re: Isn't 4.4 long term stable?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 22:09:38 +0530, Ani Sinha wrote:

> kernel.org lists linux 4.4.1 as "stable" but the releases page lists
> it as a long term stable kernel. Which one is true?

Both :) 4.4.1 is the *current* stable release and will be labeled LTS
when 4.5.1 is released. It has been this way for quite some time now.

-h

Next message: Dan Streetman: "Re: [PATCH] nbd: ratelimit error msgs after socket close"
Previous message: Al Viro: "Re: [PATCH] kernel/fork.c: use sizeof() instead of sizeof"
In reply to: Ani Sinha: "Isn't 4.4 long term stable?"
Next in thread: Greg Kroah-Hartman: "Re: Isn't 4.4 long term stable?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]