Re: FW: [RFC 3/3] CMDQ: Mediatek CMDQ driver

[Horng-Shyang Liao]

On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 14:40 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > Thanks for your comment.
> > This solution looks good to me.
> > I will change it as your suggestion.
> >
> > But, I have a question about 'mask out the provided *device virtual*
> > address'.
> > Are lower 16-bits (or 24-bits for JUMP op) of device virtual address the
> > same as device physical address?
> 
> I'm not sure.  But I doubt it we can rely on this.
> My guess would be that the ioremap only preserves the lower 12 bits
> (4k page size).
> 
> > If not, we still need to pass in physical address into CMDQ driver.
> 
> Or, instead of the iommu/slot approach, we can just provide a
> registration function for the gce driver.
> Each gce consumer could then have a simple gce node, with no slot/address:
> 
>   mediatek,gce = <&gce>;
> 
> Then on probe, the gce consumer could pass in its (struct device *) to
> gce_register_device().  gce_register_device() could then access the
> device's of_node to extract its physical address range, and look up
> its physical address in its table of per-soc of
> "device_address:gce_subsys_address" entries.  If the physical address
> is in a valid subsys ranges, the gce_register_device would cache the
> subsys address, and an offset in a (struct gce_consumer).
> gce_register_device() could then add this struct to a struct list_head
> of gce_consumers, and finally return a pointer to it back to the
> caller.
> 
> Later, the gce consumer could pass in ths (struct gce_consumer *) when
> make gce calls, along with the *offset* (not the physical address or
> virtual address) for the register that it wishes to access.  Then the
> gce driver can simply use the gce_consumer->subsys entry to create a
> gce address from the passed in offset.
> 
> This will keep the binding very simple, and would remove the need to
> convert from device virtual to physical addresses by the gce consumer,
> but require a little more per-gce-consumer setup.
> 
> -Dan

Hi Dan,

This solution is better.
I will use it.
Thanks for your suggestion.

Thanks,
HS Liao