Re: [PATCH 0/7] USB changes for rare warnings
From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Wed Feb 03 2016 - 15:50:05 EST
On Wednesday 03 February 2016 20:15:47 Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Hi Arnd,
> >
> >> arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/ixp4xx-regs.h | 198 ---------
> >> arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/pxa25x-udc.h | 163 --------
> >
> > for arch/arm I need Acked-by from relevant folks.
> You already have mine for arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/pxa25x-udc.h I think,
> or did my mailer betray me again ...
I saw it.
> I cannot speak for ixp4xx though.
Krzysztof Halasa <khalasa@xxxxxxx> gave an Ack for the first patch already,
and I think we concluded that the patch was keeping the current behavior
otherwise and is therefore not a regression, though we did not finish
the side-discussion about whether ixp4xx actually works in both BE and LE
mode with both indirect and direct I/O, or which of the four combinations
is broken.
> > Also, do you think we need this during the -rc or can we consider it
> > non-critical fixes for v4.6 merge window ?
I meant it for 4.6, sorry for not being very clear about that.
All the warnings I fixed in this series are harmless as far as I
can tell, and they only show up in rare randconfig builds.
Arnd