Re: [patch] extcon: use correct size
From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Thu Feb 04 2016 - 14:54:06 EST
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:47:41PM +0100, walter harms wrote:
>
>
> Am 04.02.2016 12:36, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > The info->status[] array has 3 elements. We are using size
> > MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM (16) instead of MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM (3) as
> > intended.
> >
> > Fixes: 135d9f7d135a ('extcon: max77843: Clear IRQ bits state before request IRQ')
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > This is from static analysis and *NOT TESTED*. Please review carefully.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> > index 7bbc300..b188bd6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> > +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max77843.c
> > @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static int max77843_muic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > /* Clear IRQ bits before request IRQs */
> > ret = regmap_bulk_read(max77843->regmap_muic,
> > MAX77843_MUIC_REG_INT1, info->status,
> > - MAX77843_MUIC_IRQ_NUM);
> > + MAX77843_MUIC_STATUS_NUM);
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to Clear IRQ bits\n");
> > goto err_muic_irq;
> > --
>
>
> just for my curiosity: what is wrong with ARRAY_SIZE() ?
> So far i understand is the functions intention to fill the array
> completely.
It's done pretty consistently the one way... Jaewon?
regards,
dan carpenter