Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen/scsiback: correct frontend counting
From: Juergen Gross
Date: Fri Feb 05 2016 - 10:44:15 EST
On 05/02/16 16:42, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
>
> On 02/05/2016 08:21 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> When adding a new frontend to xen-scsiback don't decrement the number
>> of active frontends in case of no error. Not doing so results in a
>
> I think you meant "Doing so".
I think so, too.
>
> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, Juergen
>
>
>> failure when trying to remove the xen-pvscsi nexus even if no domain
>> is using it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> ---
>> drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c | 10 +++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c b/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c
>> index ad4eb10..51387d7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c
>> +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c
>> @@ -939,12 +939,12 @@ out:
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->v2p_lock, flags);
>> out_free:
>> - mutex_lock(&tpg->tv_tpg_mutex);
>> - tpg->tv_tpg_fe_count--;
>> - mutex_unlock(&tpg->tv_tpg_mutex);
>> -
>> - if (err)
>> + if (err) {
>> + mutex_lock(&tpg->tv_tpg_mutex);
>> + tpg->tv_tpg_fe_count--;
>> + mutex_unlock(&tpg->tv_tpg_mutex);
>> kfree(new);
>> + }
>> return err;
>> }
>
>