Re: [PATCH] vsprintf: kptr_restrict is okay in IRQ when 2

[Jason A. Donenfeld]

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Instead of doing a double-check of kptr_restrict, how about moving
> this logic down into the "case 1" test? I think that would be more
> readable in the end.

Good thinking. Will roll v2.