Re: [PATCH 3/3 v4] cpufreq: governor: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks
From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Sun Feb 07 2016 - 04:20:33 EST
On 06-02-16, 04:40, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Instead of using a per-CPU deferrable timer for queuing up governor
> work items, register a utilization update callback that will be
> invoked from the scheduler on utilization changes.
>
> The sampling rate is still the same as what was used for the
> deferrable timers and the added irq_work overhead should be offset by
> the eliminated timers overhead, so in theory the functional impact of
> this patch should not be significant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Updated after the recent discussion with Viresh.
>
> Changes from v3:
> - The completion used for irq_work synchronization replaced with irq_work_sync()
> in gov_cancel_work().
> - update_sampling_rate() now modifies shared->sample_delay_ns for all CPUs
> where it matters directly with a big fat comment explaining why this is
> actually OK.
> - The above means the time_stamp field in struct cpu_common_dbs_info is not
> necessary any more, so it is dropped.
> - A build error for !CONFIG_SMP is addressed (hopefully effectively).
>
> This version was lightly tested on an x86 laptop.
Awesome work Rafael, this looks really good now.
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
viresh