Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 9

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Tuesday 09 February 2016 14:35:54 Mark Rutland wrote:
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/fixmap.h b/include/asm-generic/fixmap.h
> index f9c27b6..e5255ff 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/fixmap.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/fixmap.h
> @@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ static inline unsigned long virt_to_fix(const unsigned long vaddr)
>         __set_fixmap(idx, 0, FIXMAP_PAGE_CLEAR)
>  #endif
>  
> +void __set_fixmap(enum fixed_addresses idx, phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot);
> +
>  /* Return a pointer with offset calculated */
>  static inline unsigned long __set_fixmap_offset(enum fixed_addresses idx,
>                                                 phys_addr_t phys,
> 


I think there is a conflicting declaration in arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:

static inline void __set_fixmap(unsigned /* enum fixed_addresses */ idx,
                                phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t flags)
{
        pv_mmu_ops.set_fixmap(idx, phys, flags);
}

Can you test on x86 with CONFIG_PARAVIRT set?

	Arnd