Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 9
From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Tue Feb 09 2016 - 11:09:02 EST
On Tuesday 09 February 2016 16:01:18 Mark Rutland wrote:
> That builds fine for me atop of for-next/pgtable, both 64-bit and
> 32-bit.
>
> GCC seems to treat enum fixed_addresses the same as unsigned. Only if I
> change the type of idx in fixmap.h (e.g. to char) do I get a conflict
> against paravirt.h
Interesting.
The patch seems fine then:
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>