Re: [PATCH] irq_work: unhide irq_work_queue_on declaration on non-SMP
From: Mark Brown
Date: Wed Feb 10 2016 - 13:10:54 EST
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 04:27:42PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > +#else
> > +static inline bool irq_work_queue_on(struct irq_work *work, int cpu)
> > +{
> > + return irq_work_queue(work);
> > +}
> > #endif
> I was thinking about this too, but then cpufreq will be the only user of it.
> In any case can do it at any time later. :-)
Well, there's currently only two other users of irq_work_queue_on()
anyway so that's a third of the userbase and it does seem the obvious
way to support any other future users that want to scale down to !SMP
cases painlessly.
Reviwed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
FWIW.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature