Re: [PATCH RFC 10/22] block, bfq: add full hierarchical scheduling and cgroups support
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Thu Feb 11 2016 - 17:28:38 EST
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:12:46PM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
> From: Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Complete support for full hierarchical scheduling, with a cgroups
> interface. The name of the added policy is bfq.
>
> Weights can be assigned explicitly to groups and processes through the
> cgroups interface, differently from what happens, for single
> processes, if the cgroups interface is not used (as explained in the
> description of the previous patch). In particular, since each node has
> a full scheduler, each group can be assigned its own weight.
* It'd be great if how cgroup support is achieved is better
documented.
* How's writeback handled?
* After all patches are applied, both CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED and
CONFIG_CFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED exist.
* The default weight and weight range don't seem to follow the defined
interface on the v2 hierarchy. The default value should be 100.
* With all patches applied, booting triggers a RCU context warning.
Please build with lockdep and RCU debugging turned on and fix the
issue.
* I was testing on the v2 hierarchy with two top-level cgroups one
hosting sequential workload and the other completely random. While
they eventually converged to a reasonable state, starting up the
sequential workload while the random workload was running was
extremely slow. It crawled for quite a while.
* And "echo 100 > io.weight" hung the writing process.
Thanks.
--
tejun