Re: [PATCH RFC 09/22] block, cfq: replace CFQ with the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler

[Tejun Heo]

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 04:02:09PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> I personally find very little value in them but there are definitely
> people who care about them judging by the patches I get when they go out
> of sync.

idk, istr this coming up some months ago and there really weren't good
arguments for furthering out-of-line generated docs.  I'm sure there
are people building and checking for errors but that doesn't indicate
the actual usefulness or that we shouldn't move away from it.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun