Re: [patch 07/11] x86/perf/uncore: Track packages not per cpu data

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Andi Kleen wrote:

> > Do you have any data to back that up or is that just "believe" ?
> 
> I've seen systems with discontiguous apic ids before.
> 
> It is obvious if you consider setups with node hotplug.

Right, but if you have 1024 maximal cores and 
 
> BTW reading this thread you don't seem interested in any code review
> feedback, attacking everyone, not bothering to look up data sheets,

I did look up data sheets, but I assumed that IVB is the same. But that's what
reviews are for.

> not understanding the hardware you're changing the driver for, etc.

Oh well.

> Why do you even bother to post the patches?

Just to annoy you.

Thanks,

	tglx