Re: [PATCH] rtc: max77686: fix irqf_oneshot.cocci warnings
From: Valentin Rothberg
Date: Thu Feb 18 2016 - 03:46:15 EST
Hi Krzysztof,
On 2/18/16 9:13 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 18.02.2016 17:06, Valentin Rothberg wrote:
>> From: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Since commit 1c6c69525b40 ("genirq: Reject bogus threaded irq requests")
>> threaded IRQs without a primary handler need to be requested with
>> IRQF_ONESHOT, otherwise the request will fail.
>>
>> So pass the IRQF_ONESHOT flag in this case.
>>
>> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/irqf_oneshot.cocci
>>
>> CC: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <valentin.rothberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>
> Nack, because:
> 1. AFAIR this is a false positive.
Looking at kernel/irq/manage.c +1250 such requests will be rejected
unconditionally when the primary handler is NULL, except when the chip
is marked to be oneshot safe.
Is there another semantic that I am not aware of? In case the script
produces false positives, I will change it immediately.
> 2. Was it tested? Was it reproduced? Was the bug actually spotted or
> just coccicheck pointed this and you assumed that "request will fail"?
>
> Coccicheck is a great tool... but not necessarily for pointing run-time
> bugs.
I did not test it. To me the issue rather seems seems like something
where Coccinelle is really good at, static analysis.
Kind regards,
Valentin