Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: Use %u for unsigned int, %zu for size_t

From: Mark Brown
Date: Thu Feb 18 2016 - 08:36:32 EST

Next message: Linus LÃssing: "Re: [PATCH] net: fix bridge multicast packet checksum validation"
Previous message: Borislav Petkov: "Re: [PATCH v2] x86/head64: no need to define early_idt_ripmsg only if CONFIG_KALLSYMS=n"
In reply to: Thierry Reding: "[PATCH 2/2] spi: Prevent a type mismatch warning using min_t()"
Next in thread: Thierry Reding: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: Use %u for unsigned int, %zu for size_t"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 02:32:57PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> When printing unsigned int it is more idiomatic to use %u, for size_t
> the correct specifier is %zu (see Documentation/printk-formats.txt).

These don't apply against current code, please check and resend. Fabio
sent some similar patches the other day.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Next message: Linus LÃssing: "Re: [PATCH] net: fix bridge multicast packet checksum validation"
Previous message: Borislav Petkov: "Re: [PATCH v2] x86/head64: no need to define early_idt_ripmsg only if CONFIG_KALLSYMS=n"
In reply to: Thierry Reding: "[PATCH 2/2] spi: Prevent a type mismatch warning using min_t()"
Next in thread: Thierry Reding: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: Use %u for unsigned int, %zu for size_t"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]