Re: [PATCH 1/1] ser_gigaset: use container_of() instead of detour

[David Miller]

From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 21:29:08 +0100

> The purpose of gigaset_device_release() is to kfree() the struct
> ser_cardstate that contains our struct device. This is done via a bit of
> a detour. First we make our struct device's driver_data point to the
> container of our struct ser_cardstate (which is a struct cardstate). In
> gigaset_device_release() we then retrieve that driver_data again. And
> after that we finally kfree() the struct ser_cardstate that was saved in
> the struct cardstate.
> 
> All of this can be achieved much easier by using container_of() to get
> from our struct device to its container, struct ser_cardstate. Do so.
> 
> Note that at the time the detour was implemented commit b8b2c7d845d5
> ("base/platform: assert that dev_pm_domain callbacks are called
> unconditionally") had just entered the tree. That commit disconnected
> our platform_device and our platform_driver. These were reconnected
> again in v4.5-rc2 through commit 25cad69f21f5 ("base/platform: Fix
> platform drivers with no probe callback"). And one of the consequences
> of that fix was that it broke the detour via driver_data. That's because
> it made __device_release_driver() stop being a NOP for our struct device
> and actually do stuff again. One of the things it now does, is setting
> our driver_data to NULL. That, in turn, makes it impossible for
> gigaset_device_release() to get to our struct cardstate. Which has the
> net effect of leaking a struct ser_cardstate at every call of this
> driver's tty close() operation. So using container_of() has the
> additional benefit of actually working.
> 
> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>

Applied, thanks.