Re: Unhelpful caching decisions, possibly related to active/inactive sizing

From: Andres Freund
Date: Fri Feb 19 2016 - 17:07:25 EST


Hi Johannes,

On 2016-02-12 15:24:05 -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> I've updated the patch to work with cgroups.

Are tests of this patch, in contrast to the earlier version, necessary?
If so, what's this patch based upon? Because it doesn't seem to apply
cleanly to any tree I know about. Not very hard to resolve conflicts,
mind you, but ...

- Andres