Fixed a coding style issue.I thought I proposed this exact patch...hmm...
Signed-off-by: Philippe Loctaux <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
index 5fb60ea..7914dd2 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
@@ -227,9 +227,9 @@ static inline void thresh_exec_hook(struct __btrfs_workqueue *wq)
out:
spin_unlock(&wq->thres_lock);
- if (need_change) {
+ if (need_change)
workqueue_set_max_active(wq->normal_wq, wq->current_active);
- }
+
}
static void run_ordered_work(struct __btrfs_workqueue *wq)