Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: fix comment about return value of cpufreq_register_driver()

[Viresh Kumar]

On 20-02-16, 21:50, Eric Biggers wrote:
> The comment has been incorrect since commit 4dea5806d332
> ("cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering").
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index e979ec7..bfefc91 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -2384,7 +2384,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_boost_enabled);
>   * submitted by the CPU Frequency driver.
>   *
>   * Registers a CPU Frequency driver to this core code. This code
> - * returns zero on success, -EBUSY when another driver got here first
> + * returns zero on success, -EEXIST when another driver got here first
>   * (and isn't unregistered in the meantime).
>   *
>   */

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
viresh