Re: [PATCH] [RFC] ARM: keystone: possibly fix big-endian kernels
From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Tue Feb 23 2016 - 10:01:53 EST
On Tuesday 23 February 2016 14:53:18 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 03:43:21PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > While discussing a regressing in the netcp driver, I wondered
> > whether Keystone can work with a big-endian kernel, and noticed
> > that we don't switch endianess when we enter the kernel on the
> > secondary CPU, or when we call into smc.
>
> NAK. Sorry Arnd, you're worringly wrong on this.
>
> secondary_startup will do the setend if necessary, there's no need
> to do this kind of junk in each and every platform. It's been this
> way since:
>
> commit 97bcb0fea590d3d704f985bec08f342d28992634
> Author: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri Feb 1 09:40:42 2013 +0000
>
> So, I hope you've not been telling platform folk to do this. Please
> audit the arm-soc code to make sure, thanks.
>
I see my mistake now: I looked at the secondary_startup() function
by looking up the location in ctags, and that pointed me to
arch/arm/kernel/head-nommu.S.
I was surprised when I didn't see the setend() in there, but
didn't realize that I was looking in the wrong place, but it
made some sense when I found the setend in a couple of other
platforms that all need a wrapper anyway.
Sorry about the noise.
Arnd