Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches
From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Tue Feb 23 2016 - 16:06:04 EST
On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 04:02 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
[...]
> @stable: Kernels that predate SCHED_DEADLINE can use this simple (and tested)
> check in lieu of backport of the full 18 patch mainline treatment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Âkernel/sched/fair.c |ÂÂÂÂ9 +++++++++
> Â1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -4008,6 +4008,7 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct
> Â Â* 2) cannot be migrated to this CPU due to cpus_allowed, or
> Â Â* 3) running (obviously), or
> Â Â* 4) are cache-hot on their current CPU.
> + Â* 5) p->pi_lock is held.
> Â Â*/
> Â if (throttled_lb_pair(task_group(p), env->src_cpu, env->dst_cpu))
> Â return 0;
> @@ -4049,6 +4050,14 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct
> Â }
> Â
> Â /*
> + Â* rt -> fair class change may be in progress.ÂÂIf we sneak in should
> + Â* double_lock_balance() release rq->lock, and move the task, we will
> + Â* cause switched_to_fair() to meet a passed but no longer valid rq.
> + Â*/
> + if (raw_spin_is_locked(&p->pi_lock))
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> Â Â* Aggressive migration if:
> Â Â* 1) task is cache cold, or
> Â Â* 2) too many balance attempts have failed.
Queued up for 3.2, thanks.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part