Re: [PATCH] VMD: Attach vmd resources to parent domain's resource tree
From: Jon Derrick
Date: Tue Feb 23 2016 - 18:47:27 EST
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:16:11PM +0000, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 02:50:13PM -0700, Jon Derrick wrote:
> > This patch attaches the new VMD domain's resources to the VMD device's
> > resources. This allows /proc/iomem to display a more complete picture.
> >
> > Before:
> > c0000000-c1ffffff : 0000:5d:05.5
> > c2000000-c3ffffff : 0000:5d:05.5
> > c2010000-c2013fff : nvme
> > c4000000-c40fffff : 0000:5d:05.5
> >
> > After:
> > c0000000-c1ffffff : 0000:5d:05.5
> > c0000000-0000001f : VMD CFGBAR
> > c2000000-c3ffffff : 0000:5d:05.5
> > c2000000-c3ffffff : VMD MEMBAR1
> > c2000000-c22fffff : PCI Bus 10000:01
> > c2000000-c200ffff : 10000:01:00.0
> > c2010000-c2013fff : 10000:01:00.0
> > c2010000-c2013fff : nvme
> > c2300000-c24fffff : PCI Bus 10000:01
> > c4000000-c40fffff : 0000:5d:05.5
> > c4002000-c40fffff : VMD MEMBAR2
>
> I think we should drop the CFGBAR from here since that's a bus resource
> rather than IO memory. Otherwise, this looks good and useful.
Yes that entry doesn't make much sense for iomem does it. I'll drop that part.
>
> I think in the near future we should come up with a better name than
> "VMD MEMBAR" to help distinguish multiple VMD's in a system.
Seconded. I'm fine with naming it by its PCI designator, eg 10000:01:00.0, and maybe a bar designator after that (or not).