[PATCH 4.4 293/342] phy: core: fix wrong err handle for phy_power_on

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit b82fcabe212a11698fd4b3e604d2f81d929d22f6 upstream.

If phy_pm_runtime_get_sync failed but we already
enable regulator, current code return directly without
doing regulator_disable. This patch fix this problem
and cleanup err handle of phy_power_on to be more readable.

Fixes: 3be88125d85d ("phy: core: Support regulator ...")
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx>
Cc: Axel Lin <axel.lin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 drivers/phy/phy-core.c |   16 +++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
@@ -275,20 +275,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(phy_exit);
 
 int phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
 {
-	int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (!phy)
-		return 0;
+		goto out;
 
 	if (phy->pwr) {
 		ret = regulator_enable(phy->pwr);
 		if (ret)
-			return ret;
+			goto out;
 	}
 
 	ret = phy_pm_runtime_get_sync(phy);
 	if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOTSUPP)
-		return ret;
+		goto err_pm_sync;
+
 	ret = 0; /* Override possible ret == -ENOTSUPP */
 
 	mutex_lock(&phy->mutex);
@@ -296,19 +297,20 @@ int phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
 		ret = phy->ops->power_on(phy);
 		if (ret < 0) {
 			dev_err(&phy->dev, "phy poweron failed --> %d\n", ret);
-			goto out;
+			goto err_pwr_on;
 		}
 	}
 	++phy->power_count;
 	mutex_unlock(&phy->mutex);
 	return 0;
 
-out:
+err_pwr_on:
 	mutex_unlock(&phy->mutex);
 	phy_pm_runtime_put_sync(phy);
+err_pm_sync:
 	if (phy->pwr)
 		regulator_disable(phy->pwr);
-
+out:
 	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(phy_power_on);