[PATCH 4.4 115/342] namei: ->d_inode of a pinned dentry is stable only for positives

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit d4565649b6d6923369112758212b851adc407f0c upstream.

both do_last() and walk_component() risk picking a NULL inode out
of dentry about to become positive, *then* checking its flags and
seeing that it's not negative anymore and using (already stale by
then) value they'd fetched earlier.  Usually ends up oopsing soon
after that...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 fs/namei.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -1742,11 +1742,11 @@ static int walk_component(struct nameida
 		if (err < 0)
 			return err;
 
-		inode = d_backing_inode(path.dentry);
 		seq = 0;	/* we are already out of RCU mode */
 		err = -ENOENT;
 		if (d_is_negative(path.dentry))
 			goto out_path_put;
+		inode = d_backing_inode(path.dentry);
 	}
 
 	if (flags & WALK_PUT)
@@ -3130,12 +3130,12 @@ retry_lookup:
 		return error;
 
 	BUG_ON(nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU);
-	inode = d_backing_inode(path.dentry);
 	seq = 0;	/* out of RCU mode, so the value doesn't matter */
 	if (unlikely(d_is_negative(path.dentry))) {
 		path_to_nameidata(&path, nd);
 		return -ENOENT;
 	}
+	inode = d_backing_inode(path.dentry);
 finish_lookup:
 	if (nd->depth)
 		put_link(nd);