Re: [PATCH] PM: Fix crash on graph trace through x86 suspend
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Wed Mar 02 2016 - 21:08:30 EST
On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 02:36:26 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > OK, applied, but let Steven and the x86 folks see it.
The below patch looks fine to me. Anything else I should look at?
-- Steve
> >
> >>>
> >>> > ---
> >>> > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c | 7 +++++++
> >>> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >>> >
> >>> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c
> >>> > index d1daead..311360e 100644
> >>> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c
> >>> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c
> >>> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> >>> > #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> >>> > #include <asm/realmode.h>
> >>> >
> >>> > +#include <linux/ftrace.h>
> >>> > #include "../../realmode/rm/wakeup.h"
> >>> > #include "sleep.h"
> >>> >
> >>> > @@ -107,7 +108,13 @@ int x86_acpi_suspend_lowlevel(void)
> >>> > saved_magic = 0x123456789abcdef0L;
> >>> > #endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
> >>> >
> >>> > + /*
> >>> > + * Pause/unpause graph tracing around do_suspend_lowlevel as it has
> >>> > + * inconsistent call/return info after it jumps to the wakeup vector
> >>> > + */
> >>> > + pause_graph_tracing();
> >>> > do_suspend_lowlevel();
> >>> > + unpause_graph_tracing();
> >>> > return 0;
> >>> > }
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > 2.1.4
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rafael