Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86/mbm: Intel Memory B/W Monitoring enumeration and init

[Vikas Shivappa]

On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
> > +	if (cqm_enabled && mbm_enabled)
> > +		intel_cqm_events_group.attrs = intel_cmt_mbm_events_attr;
> > +	else if (!cqm_enabled && mbm_enabled)
> > +		intel_cqm_events_group.attrs = intel_mbm_events_attr;
> > +	else if (cqm_enabled && !mbm_enabled)
> > +		intel_cqm_events_group.attrs = intel_cqm_events_attr;
> > +
> >  	ret = perf_pmu_register(&intel_cqm_pmu, "intel_cqm", -1);
> >  	if (ret) {
> >  		pr_err("Intel CQM perf registration failed: %d\n", ret);
> >  		goto out;
>
> So what cleans up mbm_local and mbm_total in that case?

I put all the cleanup code in the cqm_cleanup .. - please see copy below

@@ -1331,6 +1427,39 @@ static void cqm_cleanup(void)
                kfree(cqm_rmid_ptrs[r]);

        kfree(cqm_rmid_ptrs);
+       kfree(mbm_local);
+       kfree(mbm_total);
+       mbm_enabled = false;
+       cqm_enabled = false;
+}

Thanks,
Vikas


> Thanks,
>
> 	tglx