Re: [PATCH 1/5] usb: gadget: f_midi: refactor state machine

[Clemens Ladisch]

Felipe Ferreri Tonello wrote:
> On March 4, 2016 8:07:40 AM GMT+00:00, Clemens Ladisch <clemens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Felipe Ferreri Tonello wrote:
>>> On 03/03/16 11:38, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
>>>> But in what way was the old state machine not "proper"?
>>>
>>> Because it didn't reflect all the correct and possible MIDI states
>>
>> The whole point of the one-byte real-time messages is that they do not
>> affect the parsing of the surrounding MIDI stream.  So not making them
>> part of the state machine is the proper way of handling them.  (Also
>> see the flowchart in appendix A of the spec.)
>
> I really don't get your point. So why do we have a state machine at all?

To parse all the other messages.


Regards,
Clemens