Re: + x86-add-support-for-pud-sized-transparent-hugepages-checkpatch-fixes.patch added to -mm tree

From: Matthew Wilcox
Date: Fri Mar 04 2016 - 15:31:12 EST


On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 08:48:35AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > @@ -111,8 +111,10 @@ static inline pud_t native_pudp_get_and_
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > return native_make_pud(xchg(&pudp->pud, 0));
> > #else
> > - /* native_local_pudp_get_and_clear,
> > - but duplicated because of cyclic dependency */
> > + /*
> > + * native_local_pudp_get_and_clear, but duplicated because of cyclic
> > + * dependency
> > + */
> > pud_t ret = *pudp;
> > native_pud_clear(pudp);
> > return ret;
>
> When referring to functions in comments (or changelogs) please use () to make it
> clear on sight what is being referred to.
>
> Also, please try to construct proper English sentences with verbs and such!
>
> I.e. something like this would work for me:
>
> > + /*
> > + * This is a duplicate of native_local_pudp_get_and_clear(),
> > + * because we cannot use the original due to a cyclic header
> > + * file dependency:
> > + */
>
> (Assuming I managed to decode the shorthand form properly.)

I have no idea what it means. This is copy-and-change of the pmd version,
which was originally commit db3eb96f4e6281b84dd33c8980dacc27f2efe177 by
Andrea.

It seems unfair to ask me to do better than what is there right now.