Re: [PATCH 3/4] leds: Add driver for the ISSI IS31FL32xx family of LED controllers

From: David Rivshin (Allworx)
Date: Sat Mar 05 2016 - 01:13:18 EST

Next message: pankaj.dubey: "Re: [RESPIN 1/6] dt-bindings: EXYNOS: Add exynos-srom device tree binding"
Previous message: Kejian Yan: "[PATCH v2 net] net: hns: fix the bug about loopback"
In reply to: Jacek Anaszewski: "Re: [PATCH 3/4] leds: Add driver for the ISSI IS31FL32xx family of LED controllers"
Next in thread: Jacek Anaszewski: "Re: [PATCH 3/4] leds: Add driver for the ISSI IS31FL32xx family of LED controllers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 04 Mar 2016 16:38:01 +0100
Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 03/04/2016 03:27 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote:
> > (Stefan, sorry for the duplicate, I just realized that I originally
> > replied only to you by accident).
> >
> > On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 19:13:03 +0100 (CET)
> > Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi David,
> >>
> >> i will test the driver on weekend. Some comments below
> >
> > Great, thanks very much.
> >
> >>> "David Rivshin (Allworx)" <drivshin.allworx@xxxxxxxxx> hat am 3. MÃrz 2016 um
> >>> 04:01 geschrieben:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> From: David Rivshin <drivshin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> The IS31FL32xx family of LED controllers are I2C devices with multiple
> >>> constant-current channels, each with independent 256-level PWM control.
> >>>
> >>> Datasheets: http://www.issi.com/US/product-analog-fxled-driver.shtml
> >>>
> >>> This has been tested on the IS31FL3236 and IS31FL3216, on an ARM
> >>> (TI am335x) platform.
> >>>
> >>> The programming paradigm of these devices is similar in the following
> >>> ways:
> >>> - All registers are 8 bit
> >>> - All LED control registers are write-only
> >>> - Each LED channel has a PWM register (0-255)
> >>> - PWM register writes are shadowed until an Update register is poked
> >>> - All have a concept of Software Shutdown, which disables output
> >>>
> >>> However, there are some differences in devices:
> >>> - 3236/3235 have a separate Control register for each LED,
> >>> (3218/3216 pack the enable bits into fewer registers)
> >>> - 3236/3235 have a per-channel current divisor setting
> >>> - 3236/3235 have a Global Control register that can turn off all LEDs
> >>> - 3216 is unique in a number of ways
> >>> - OUT9-OUT16 can be configured as GPIOs instead of LED controls
> >>> - LEDs can be programmed with an 8-frame animation, with
> >>> programmable delay between frames
> >>> - LEDs can be modulated by an input audio signal
> >>> - Max output current can be adjusted from 1/4 to 2x globally
> >>> - Has a Configuration register instead of a Shutdown register
> >>>
> >>> This driver currently only supports the base PWM control function
> >>> of these devices. The following features of these devices are not
> >>> implemented, although it should be possible to add them in the future:
> >>> - All devices are capable of going into a lower-power "software
> >>> shutdown" mode.
> >>> - The is31fl3236 and is31fl3235 can reduce the max output current
> >>> per-channel with a divisor of 1, 2, 3, or 4.
> >>> - The is31fl3216 can use some LED channels as GPIOs instead.
> >>> - The is31fl3216 can animate LEDs in hardware.
> >>> - The is31fl3216 can modulate LEDs according to an audio input.
> >>> - The is31fl3216 can reduce/increase max output current globally.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: David Rivshin <drivshin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> You may see two instances of this warning:
> >>> "passing argument 1 of 'of_property_read_string' discards 'const'
> >>> qualifier from pointer target type"
> >>> That is a result of of_property_read_string() taking a non-const
> >>> struct device_node pointer parameter. I have separately submitted a
> >>> patch to fix that [1], and a few related functions which had the same
> >>> issue. I'm hoping that will get into linux-next before this does, so
> >>> that the warnings never show up there.
> >>>
> >>> Changes from RFC:
> >>> - Removed max-brightness DT property.
> >>> - Refer to these devices as "LED controllers" in Kconfig.
> >>> - Removed redundant last sentence from Kconfig entry
> >>> - Removed unnecessary debug code.
> >>> - Do not set led_classdev.brightness to 0 explicitly, as it is
> >>> already initialized to 0 by devm_kzalloc().
> >>> - Used of_property_read_string() instead of of_get_property().
> >>> - Fail immediately on DT parsing error in a child node, rather than
> >>> continuing on with the non-faulty ones.
> >>> - Added additional comments for some things that might be non-obvious.
> >>> - Added constants for the location of the SSD bit in the SHUTDOWN
> >>> register, and the 3216's CONFIG register.
> >>> - Added special sw_shutdown_func for the 3216 device, as that bit
> >>> is in a different register, at a different position, and has reverse
> >>> polarity compared to all the other devices.
> >>> - Refactored is31fl32xx_init_regs() to separate out some logic into
> >>> is31fl32xx_reset_regs() and is31fl32xx_software_shutdown().
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/2/746
> >>>
> >>> drivers/leds/Kconfig | 8 +
> >>> drivers/leds/Makefile | 1 +
> >>> drivers/leds/leds-is31fl32xx.c | 505 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> 3 files changed, 514 insertions(+)
> >>> create mode 100644 drivers/leds/leds-is31fl32xx.c
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/Kconfig b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
> >>> index 1034696..9c63ba4 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/leds/Kconfig
> >>> +++ b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
> >>> @@ -580,6 +580,14 @@ config LEDS_SN3218
> >>> This driver can also be built as a module. If so the module
> >>> will be called leds-sn3218.
> >>>
> >>> +config LEDS_IS31FL32XX
> >>> + tristate "LED support for ISSI IS31FL32XX I2C LED controller family"
> >>> + depends on LEDS_CLASS && I2C && OF
> >>> + help
> >>> + Say Y here to include support for ISSI IS31FL32XX LED controllers.
> >>> + They are I2C devices with multiple constant-current channels, each
> >>> + with independent 256-level PWM control.
> >>
> >> Is it worth to mention the module name here?
> >
> > I noticed that some do and some don't. I don't mind adding it, but it
> > also seemed like it would be obvious, and therefore unnecessary.
> >
> > Jacek, which do you prefer?
>
> I agree - it's obvious, we can skip it.
>
> >>> +
> >>> comment "LED driver for blink(1) USB RGB LED is under Special HID drivers
> >>> (HID_THINGM)"
> >>>
> >>> config LEDS_BLINKM
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/Makefile b/drivers/leds/Makefile
> >>> index 89c9b6f..3fdf313 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/leds/Makefile
> >>> +++ b/drivers/leds/Makefile
> >>> @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_KTD2692) += leds-ktd2692.o
> >>> obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_POWERNV) += leds-powernv.o
> >>> obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_SEAD3) += leds-sead3.o
> >>> obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_SN3218) += leds-sn3218.o
> >>> +obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_IS31FL32XX) += leds-is31fl32xx.o
> >>>
> >>> # LED SPI Drivers
> >>> obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_DAC124S085) += leds-dac124s085.o
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-is31fl32xx.c b/drivers/leds/leds-is31fl32xx.c
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 0000000..49818f0
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-is31fl32xx.c
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,505 @@
> >>> +/*
> >>> + * linux/drivers/leds-is31fl32xx.c
> >>
> >> I think this is unnecessary.
> >
> > I tend to agree. I think I used leds-pwm.c as a template, and that had
> > such a comment. I assumed it was coding-style and kept it, but now I see
> > that only a minority of led drivers have it. If I do another spin for
> > any reason I'll remove it.
> >
> >>> + *
> >>> + * Driver for ISSI IS31FL32xx family of I2C LED controllers
> >>> + *
> >>> + * Copyright 2015 Allworx Corp.
> >>> + *
> >>> + *
> >>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> >>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> >>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> >>> + *
> >>> + * Datasheets: http://www.issi.com/US/product-analog-fxled-driver.shtml
> >>> + */
> >>> +
> >>
> >> Shouldn't we include <linux/device.h> here?
> >
> > Good catch. I was getting that via i2c.h, but since struct device is
> > referenced explicitly in a few places, device.h should probably be
> > included directly.
>
> linux/device.h is included from linux/leds.h

This is true, but SubmitChecklist says the following on this topic:
1: If you use a facility then #include the file that defines/declares
that facility. Don't depend on other header files pulling in ones
that you use.
(Oddly CodingStyle is silent on the topic, which is where I would have
thought such a thing would be documented.)

I interpreted that to mean that because 'struct device*' appears in
this file, it should include <linux/device.h> directly.

> >>> +#include <linux/err.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/leds.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/module.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> >>> +
> >>> +/* Used to indicate a device has no such register */
> >>> +#define IS31FL32XX_REG_NONE 0xFF
> >>> +
> >>> +/* Software Shutdown bit in Shutdown Register */
> >>> +#define IS31FL32XX_SHUTDOWN_SSD_ENABLE 0
> >>> +#define IS31FL32XX_SHUTDOWN_SSD_DISABLE BIT(0)
> >>> +
> >>> +/* IS31FL3216 has a number of unique registers */
> >>> +#define IS31FL3216_CONFIG_REG 0x00
> >>> +#define IS31FL3216_LIGHTING_EFFECT_REG 0x03
> >>> +#define IS31FL3216_CHANNEL_CONFIG_REG 0x04
> >>> +
> >>> +/* Software Shutdown bit in 3216 Config Register */
> >>> +#define IS31FL3216_CONFIG_SSD_ENABLE BIT(7)
> >>> +#define IS31FL3216_CONFIG_SSD_DISABLE 0
> >>> +
> >>> +struct is31fl32xx_priv;
> >>> +struct is31fl32xx_led_data {
> >>> + struct led_classdev cdev;
> >>> + u8 channel; /* 1-based, max priv->cdef->channels */
> >>> + struct is31fl32xx_priv *priv;
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +struct is31fl32xx_priv {
> >>> + const struct is31fl32xx_chipdef *cdef;
> >>> + struct i2c_client *client;
> >>> + unsigned int num_leds;
> >>> + struct is31fl32xx_led_data leds[0];
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +/**
> >>> + * struct is31fl32xx_chipdef - chip-specific attributes
> >>> + * @channels : Number of LED channels
> >>> + * @shutdown_reg : address of Shutdown register (optional)
> >>> + * @pwm_update_reg : address of PWM Update register
> >>> + * @global_control_reg : address of Global Control register (optional)
> >>> + * @reset_reg : address of Reset register (optional)
> >>> + * @pwm_register_base : address of first PWM register
> >>> + * @pwm_registers_reversed: : true if PWM registers count down instead of up
> >>> + * @led_control_register_base : address of first LED control register
> >>> (optional)
> >>> + * @enable_bits_per_led_control_register: number of LEDs enable bits in each
> >>> + * @reset_func: : pointer to reset function
> >>> + *
> >>> + * For all optional register addresses, the sentinel value
> >>> %IS31FL32XX_REG_NONE
> >>> + * indicates that this chip has no such register.
> >>> + *
> >>> + * If non-NULL, @reset_func will be called during probing to set all
> >>> + * necessary registers to a known initialization state. This is needed
> >>> + * for chips that do not have a @reset_reg.
> >>> + *
> >>> + * @enable_bits_per_led_control_register must be >=1 if
> >>> + * @led_control_register_base != %IS31FL32XX_REG_NONE.
> >>> + */
> >>> +struct is31fl32xx_chipdef {
> >>> + u8 channels;
> >>> + u8 shutdown_reg;
> >>> + u8 pwm_update_reg;
> >>> + u8 global_control_reg;
> >>> + u8 reset_reg;
> >>> + u8 pwm_register_base;
> >>> + bool pwm_registers_reversed;
> >>> + u8 led_control_register_base;
> >>> + u8 enable_bits_per_led_control_register;
> >>> + int (*reset_func)(struct is31fl32xx_priv *priv);
> >>> + int (*sw_shutdown_func)(struct is31fl32xx_priv *priv, bool enable);
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static const struct is31fl32xx_chipdef is31fl3236_cdef = {
> >>> + .channels = 36,
> >>> + .shutdown_reg = 0x00,
> >>> + .pwm_update_reg = 0x25,
> >>> + .global_control_reg = 0x4a,
> >>> + .reset_reg = 0x4f,
> >>> + .pwm_register_base = 0x01,
> >>> + .led_control_register_base = 0x26,
> >>> + .enable_bits_per_led_control_register = 1,
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static const struct is31fl32xx_chipdef is31fl3235_cdef = {
> >>> + .channels = 28,
> >>> + .shutdown_reg = 0x00,
> >>> + .pwm_update_reg = 0x25,
> >>> + .global_control_reg = 0x4a,
> >>> + .reset_reg = 0x4f,
> >>> + .pwm_register_base = 0x05,
> >>> + .led_control_register_base = 0x2a,
> >>> + .enable_bits_per_led_control_register = 1,
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static const struct is31fl32xx_chipdef is31fl3218_cdef = {
> >>> + .channels = 18,
> >>> + .shutdown_reg = 0x00,
> >>> + .pwm_update_reg = 0x16,
> >>> + .global_control_reg = IS31FL32XX_REG_NONE,
> >>> + .reset_reg = 0x17,
> >>> + .pwm_register_base = 0x01,
> >>> + .led_control_register_base = 0x13,
> >>> + .enable_bits_per_led_control_register = 6,
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static int is31fl3216_reset(struct is31fl32xx_priv *priv);
> >>> +static int is31fl3216_software_shutdown(struct is31fl32xx_priv *priv,
> >>> + bool enable);
> >>> +static const struct is31fl32xx_chipdef is31fl3216_cdef = {
> >>> + .channels = 16,
> >>> + .shutdown_reg = IS31FL32XX_REG_NONE,
> >>> + .pwm_update_reg = 0xB0,
> >>> + .global_control_reg = IS31FL32XX_REG_NONE,
> >>> + .reset_reg = IS31FL32XX_REG_NONE,
> >>> + .pwm_register_base = 0x10,
> >>> + .pwm_registers_reversed = true,
> >>> + .led_control_register_base = 0x01,
> >>> + .enable_bits_per_led_control_register = 8,
> >>> + .reset_func = is31fl3216_reset,
> >>> + .sw_shutdown_func = is31fl3216_software_shutdown,
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static int is31fl32xx_write(struct is31fl32xx_priv *priv, u8 reg, u8 val)
> >>> +{
> >>> + int ret;
> >>> +
> >>> + dev_dbg(&priv->client->dev, "writing register 0x%02X=0x%02X", reg, val);
> >>> +
> >>> + ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(priv->client, reg, val);
> >>> + if (ret) {
> >>> + dev_err(&priv->client->dev,
> >>> + "register write to 0x%02X failed (error %d)",
> >>> + reg, ret);
> >>> + }
> >>
> >> In case somebody use this driver as heartbeat and writing fails permanently the
> >> log will be flooded.
> >
> > Unless I'm mistaken that would require the device/bus to fail after
> > successfully probing (probe code itself bails on the first write
> > failure, so there would be no flooding as a result of that). So while
> > not impossible, I imagine it would be unlikely, and I'd hate to remove
> > an error message for such an important condition.
> >
> > I suppose I could use dev_err_ratelimited() to soften any potential
> > flooding, but I second guess that because:
> > - In led_core.c set_brightness_delayed() has a dev_err() that would come
> > out on each failed LED update anyways.
> > - There is precedent in other led drivers of a similar error message.
> > - Some userspace logging programs will compresses repeated messages anyways.
> >
> > Jacek, what is your preference on this?
>
> Let's leave it as is. Permanent I2C bus failure is a critical error and
> flooding the log would only allow to diagnose the problem quicker.
>
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +/*
> >>> + * Custom reset function for IS31FL3216 because it does not have a RESET
> >>> + * register the way that the other IS31FL32xx chips do. We don't bother
> >>> + * writing the GPIO and animation registers, because the registers we
> >>> + * do write ensure those will have no effect.
> >>> + */
> >>> +static int is31fl3216_reset(struct is31fl32xx_priv *priv)
> >>> +{
> >>> + unsigned int i;
> >>> + int ret;
> >>> +
> >>> + ret = is31fl32xx_write(priv, IS31FL3216_CONFIG_REG,
> >>> + IS31FL3216_CONFIG_SSD_ENABLE);
> >>> + if (ret)
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> + for (i = 0; i < priv->cdef->channels; i++) {
> >>> + ret = is31fl32xx_write(priv, priv->cdef->pwm_register_base+i,
> >>> + 0x00);
> >>> + if (ret)
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> + }
> >>> + ret = is31fl32xx_write(priv, priv->cdef->pwm_update_reg, 0);
> >>> + if (ret)
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> + ret = is31fl32xx_write(priv, IS31FL3216_LIGHTING_EFFECT_REG, 0x00);
> >>> + if (ret)
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> + ret = is31fl32xx_write(priv, IS31FL3216_CHANNEL_CONFIG_REG, 0x00);
> >>> + if (ret)
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> +
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +/*
> >>> + * Custom Software-Shutdown function for IS31FL3216 because it does not have
> >>> + * a SHUTDOWN register the way that the other IS31FL32xx chips do.
> >>> + * We don't bother doing a read/modify/write on the CONFIG register because
> >>> + * we only ever use a value of '0' for the other fields in that register.
> >>> + */
> >>> +static int is31fl3216_software_shutdown(struct is31fl32xx_priv *priv,
> >>> + bool enable)
> >>> +{
> >>> + u8 value = enable ? IS31FL3216_CONFIG_SSD_ENABLE :
> >>> + IS31FL3216_CONFIG_SSD_DISABLE;
> >>> +
> >>> + return is31fl32xx_write(priv, IS31FL3216_CONFIG_REG, value);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +/*
> >>> + * NOTE: A mutex is not needed in this function because:
> >>> + * - All referenced data is read-only after probe()
> >>> + * - The I2C core has a mutex on to protect the bus
> >>> + * - There are no read/modify/write operations
> >>> + * - Intervening operations between the write of the PWM register
> >>> + * and the Update register are harmless.
> >>> + *
> >>> + * Example:
> >>> + * PWM_REG_1 write 16
> >>> + * UPDATE_REG write 0
> >>> + * PWM_REG_2 write 128
> >>> + * UPDATE_REG write 0
> >>> + * vs:
> >>> + * PWM_REG_1 write 16
> >>> + * PWM_REG_2 write 128
> >>> + * UPDATE_REG write 0
> >>> + * UPDATE_REG write 0
> >>> + * are equivalent. Poking the Update register merely applies all PWM
> >>> + * register writes up to that point.
> >>> + */
> >>> +static int is31fl32xx_brightness_set(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
> >>> + enum led_brightness brightness)
> >>> +{
> >>> + const struct is31fl32xx_led_data *led_data =
> >>> + container_of(led_cdev, struct is31fl32xx_led_data, cdev);
> >>> + const struct is31fl32xx_chipdef *cdef = led_data->priv->cdef;
> >>> + u8 pwm_register_offset;
> >>> + int ret;
> >>> +
> >>> + dev_dbg(led_cdev->dev, "%s: %d\n", __func__, brightness);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* NOTE: led_data->channel is 1-based */
> >>> + if (cdef->pwm_registers_reversed)
> >>> + pwm_register_offset = cdef->channels - led_data->channel;
> >>> + else
> >>> + pwm_register_offset = led_data->channel - 1;
> >>> +
> >>> + ret = is31fl32xx_write(led_data->priv,
> >>> + cdef->pwm_register_base + pwm_register_offset,
> >>> + brightness);
> >>> + if (ret)
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> +
> >>> + return is31fl32xx_write(led_data->priv, cdef->pwm_update_reg, 0);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int is31fl32xx_reset_regs(struct is31fl32xx_priv *priv)
> >>> +{
> >>> + const struct is31fl32xx_chipdef *cdef = priv->cdef;
> >>> + int ret;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (cdef->reset_reg != IS31FL32XX_REG_NONE) {
> >>> + ret = is31fl32xx_write(priv, cdef->reset_reg, 0);
> >>> + if (ret)
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + if (cdef->reset_func)
> >>> + return cdef->reset_func(priv);
> >>> +
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int is31fl32xx_software_shutdown(struct is31fl32xx_priv *priv,
> >>> + bool enable)
> >>> +{
> >>> + const struct is31fl32xx_chipdef *cdef = priv->cdef;
> >>> + int ret;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (cdef->shutdown_reg != IS31FL32XX_REG_NONE) {
> >>> + u8 value = enable ? IS31FL32XX_SHUTDOWN_SSD_ENABLE :
> >>> + IS31FL32XX_SHUTDOWN_SSD_DISABLE;
> >>> + ret = is31fl32xx_write(priv, cdef->shutdown_reg, value);
> >>> + if (ret)
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + if (cdef->sw_shutdown_func)
> >>> + return cdef->sw_shutdown_func(priv, enable);
> >>> +
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int is31fl32xx_init_regs(struct is31fl32xx_priv *priv)
> >>> +{
> >>> + const struct is31fl32xx_chipdef *cdef = priv->cdef;
> >>> + int ret;
> >>> +
> >>> + ret = is31fl32xx_reset_regs(priv);
> >>> + if (ret)
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> +
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * Set enable bit for all channels.
> >>> + * We will control state with PWM registers alone.
> >>> + */
> >>> + if (cdef->led_control_register_base != IS31FL32XX_REG_NONE) {
> >>> + u8 value =
> >>> + GENMASK(cdef->enable_bits_per_led_control_register-1, 0);
> >>> + u8 num_regs = cdef->channels /
> >>> + cdef->enable_bits_per_led_control_register;
> >>> + int i;
> >>> +
> >>> + for (i = 0; i < num_regs; i++) {
> >>> + ret = is31fl32xx_write(priv,
> >>> + cdef->led_control_register_base+i,
> >>> + value);
> >>> + if (ret)
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> + }
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + ret = is31fl32xx_software_shutdown(priv, false);
> >>> + if (ret)
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (cdef->global_control_reg != IS31FL32XX_REG_NONE) {
> >>> + ret = is31fl32xx_write(priv, cdef->global_control_reg, 0x00);
> >>> + if (ret)
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static inline size_t sizeof_is31fl32xx_priv(int num_leds)
> >>> +{
> >>> + return sizeof(struct is31fl32xx_priv) +
> >>> + (sizeof(struct is31fl32xx_led_data) * num_leds);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int is31fl32xx_parse_child_dt(const struct device *dev,
> >>> + const struct device_node *child,
> >>> + struct is31fl32xx_led_data *led_data)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct led_classdev *cdev = &led_data->cdev;
> >>> + int ret = 0;
> >>> + u32 reg;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (of_property_read_string(child, "label", &cdev->name))
> >>> + cdev->name = child->name;
> >>> +
> >>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &reg);
> >>> + if (ret || reg < 1 || reg > led_data->priv->cdef->channels) {
> >>> + dev_err(dev,
> >>> + "Child node %s does not have a valid reg property\n",
> >>> + child->full_name);
> >>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>> + }
> >>> + led_data->channel = reg;
> >>> +
> >>> + of_property_read_string(child, "linux,default-trigger",
> >>> + &cdev->default_trigger);
> >>> +
> >>> + cdev->brightness_set_blocking = is31fl32xx_brightness_set;
> >>> +
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static struct is31fl32xx_led_data *is31fl32xx_find_led_data(
> >>> + struct is31fl32xx_priv *priv,
> >>> + u8 channel)
> >>> +{
> >>> + size_t i;
> >>> +
> >>> + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_leds; i++) {
> >>> + if (priv->leds[i].channel == channel)
> >>> + return &priv->leds[i];
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + return NULL;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int is31fl32xx_parse_dt(struct device *dev,
> >>> + struct is31fl32xx_priv *priv)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct device_node *child;
> >>> + int ret = 0;
> >>> +
> >>> + for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, child) {
> >>> + struct is31fl32xx_led_data *led_data =
> >>> + &priv->leds[priv->num_leds];
> >>
> >> Maybe i missed something, but is it really protected against out of index
> >> access?
> >
> > The array is allocated with size equal to the number of child nodes,
> > and num_leds is incremented once for each child node parsed. So in
> > order for the index to be out of bounds, the number of child nodes
> > would need to increase during the probe. I assumed that the DT is
> > static during probing, but if that's not the case then you're right
> > that this is a potential problem. Also, this equivalent logic is
> > used in leds-pwm, leds-gpio, and leds-ns2, so that gives me
> > confidence that its safe.
> > Unless DT overlays change that assumption?
>
> DT overlays would matter here if child DT nodes could be dynamically
> removed, i.e. if it was possible by design to dynamically unplug LEDs
> from the current outputs during LED controller operation, which is not
> the case for this device (and any other LED controller I am aware of).
>
> >>> + const struct is31fl32xx_led_data *other_led_data;
> >>> +
> >>> + led_data->priv = priv;
> >>> +
> >>> + ret = is31fl32xx_parse_child_dt(dev, child, led_data);
> >>> + if (ret)
> >>> + goto err;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Detect if channel is already in use by another child */
> >>> + other_led_data = is31fl32xx_find_led_data(priv,
> >>> + led_data->channel);
> >>> + if (other_led_data) {
> >>> + dev_err(dev,
> >>> + "%s and %s both attempting to use channel %d\n",
> >>> + led_data->cdev.name,
> >>> + other_led_data->cdev.name,
> >>> + led_data->channel);
> >>> + goto err;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + ret = devm_led_classdev_register(dev, &led_data->cdev);
> >>> + if (ret) {
> >>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to register PWM led for %s: %d\n",
> >>> + led_data->cdev.name, ret);
> >>> + goto err;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + priv->num_leds++;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +
> >>> +err:
> >>> + of_node_put(child);
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static const struct of_device_id of_is31fl31xx_match[] = {
> >>> + { .compatible = "issi,is31fl3236", .data = &is31fl3236_cdef, },
> >>> + { .compatible = "issi,is31fl3235", .data = &is31fl3235_cdef, },
> >>> + { .compatible = "issi,is31fl3218", .data = &is31fl3218_cdef, },
> >>> + { .compatible = "issi,is31fl3216", .data = &is31fl3216_cdef, },
> >>> + {},
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_is31fl31xx_match);
> >>> +
> >>> +static int is31fl32xx_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >>> + const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> >>> +{
> >>> + const struct is31fl32xx_chipdef *cdef;
> >>> + const struct of_device_id *of_dev_id;
> >>> + struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> >>> + struct is31fl32xx_priv *priv;
> >>> + int count;
> >>> + int ret = 0;
> >>> +
> >>> + of_dev_id = of_match_device(of_is31fl31xx_match, dev);
> >>> + if (!of_dev_id)
> >>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>> +
> >>> + cdef = of_dev_id->data;
> >>> +
> >>> + count = of_get_child_count(dev->of_node);
> >>> + if (!count)
> >>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>> +
> >>> + priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof_is31fl32xx_priv(count),
> >>> + GFP_KERNEL);
> >>> + if (!priv)
> >>> + return -ENOMEM;
> >>> +
> >>> + priv->client = client;
> >>> + priv->cdef = cdef;
> >>> + i2c_set_clientdata(client, priv);
> >>> +
> >>> + ret = is31fl32xx_init_regs(priv);
> >>> + if (ret)
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> +
> >>> + ret = is31fl32xx_parse_dt(dev, priv);
> >>> + if (ret)
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> +
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int is31fl32xx_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct is31fl32xx_priv *priv = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> >>> +
> >>> + return is31fl32xx_reset_regs(priv);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +/*
> >>> + * i2c-core requires that id_table be non-NULL, even though
> >>> + * it is not used for DeviceTree based instantiation.
> >>> + */
> >>> +static const struct i2c_device_id is31fl31xx_id[] = {
> >>> + {},
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, is31fl31xx_id);
> >>> +
> >>> +static struct i2c_driver is31fl32xx_driver = {
> >>> + .driver = {
> >>> + .name = "is31fl32xx",
> >>> + .of_match_table = of_is31fl31xx_match,
> >>> + },
> >>> + .probe = is31fl32xx_probe,
> >>> + .remove = is31fl32xx_remove,
> >>
> >> Sorry, what was the reason to skip shutdown?
> >
> > If I understood Jacek's last email on the topic [1] correctly, he's now
> > of the opinion that the decision to turn LEDs off on reboot should be
> > left to userspace, rather than done by the driver. For these devices,
> > the only thing a shutdown callback would do is turn off the LEDs (through
> > any of multiple methods). So, if we want to leave the state as-is on
> > reboot there's no need for a shutdown callback.
> >
> > [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-leds/msg05644.html
> >
> >>> + .id_table = is31fl31xx_id,
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +module_i2c_driver(is31fl32xx_driver);
> >>> +
> >>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("David Rivshin <drivshin@xxxxxxxxxxx>");
> >>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ISSI IS31FL32xx LED driver");
> >>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> >>> --
> >>> 2.5.0
> >>>

Next message: pankaj.dubey: "Re: [RESPIN 1/6] dt-bindings: EXYNOS: Add exynos-srom device tree binding"
Previous message: Kejian Yan: "[PATCH v2 net] net: hns: fix the bug about loopback"
In reply to: Jacek Anaszewski: "Re: [PATCH 3/4] leds: Add driver for the ISSI IS31FL32xx family of LED controllers"
Next in thread: Jacek Anaszewski: "Re: [PATCH 3/4] leds: Add driver for the ISSI IS31FL32xx family of LED controllers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]