Re: [PATCH 2/4] nmi_backtrace: generate one-line reports for idle cpus

From: Chris Metcalf
Date: Mon Mar 07 2016 - 12:05:33 EST


On 03/07/2016 03:26 AM, Daniel Thompson wrote:
Chris Metcalf wrote:
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, cpu_idling);
+
+/* Was the cpu was in the low-level idle code when interrupted? */
+bool in_cpu_idle(void)
+{
+ return this_cpu_read(cpu_idling);

I think we continue to need the code to identify a core that is running an interrupt handler. Interrupts are not masked at the point we set cpu_idling to false meaning we can easily be preempted before we clear the flag.

Yes, good catch. However, mooted by PeterZ wanting to keep any extra state-switching code out of the idle path. See my reply to him for more on that.

--
Chris Metcalf, Mellanox Technologies
http://www.mellanox.com