Re: [PATCH 01/11] rxrpc: Add a common object cache

From: David Howells
Date: Tue Mar 08 2016 - 08:02:45 EST

David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Does it make sense to maintain a FIFO list of connections (though this would
> mean potentially taking a spinlock every time I get a packet)?

It occurs to me that only inactive connections would need to be on an LRU
list. Any connection with packets or active calls to deal with wouldn't be on
the list.