å 09/03/2016 07:34, Doug Anderson åé:
Xing Zheng,ok, we will upload dtsi later after the clk-rk3399 driver been applied.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Xing Zheng <zhengxing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:+ MMC(SCLK_SDMMC_DRV, "emmc_drv", "clk_sdmmc", RK3399_SDMMC_CON0, 1),
+ MMC(SCLK_SDMMC_SAMPLE, "emmc_sample", "clk_sdmmc", RK3399_SDMMC_CON1, 1),
Can you and Jianqun Xu please coordinate? Though I don't have a TRM
for rk3399 and I haven't looked through this whole patch, I know for
sure there's a problem when I pick the latest patch series from both
of you it doesn't compile.
I believe this is the latest from each of you in patchwork:
8462411 [v3,1/3] dt-bindings: add bindings for rk3399 clock controller
8462431 [v3,2/3] clk: rockchip: add dt-binding header for rk3399
8462441 [v3,3/3] ARM64: dts: rockchip: add core dtsi file for rk3399
8463741 [RESEND,v2,1/5] clk: rockchip: add more mux parameters for
new pll sources
8463801 [RESEND,v2,2/5] clk: rockchip: Add support for multiple
8463771 [RESEND,v2,3/5] clk: rockchip: add new pll-type for rk3399
and similar socs
8463781 [RESEND,v2,4/5] clk: rockchip: add a COMPOSITE_FRACMUX_NOGATE type
8463831 [RESEND,v2,5/5] clk: rockchip: add clock controller for the RK3399
Specifically your patch from March 1st refers to SCLK_SDMMC_DRV and
SCLK_SDMMC_SAMPLE. Those defines existed in Jianqun Xu's patch back
on Feb 19th <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8355411/>, but his
latest patch series from March 1st
<https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8462431/> no longer has those
Can you two resolve this so I can pick both patch series and see that
they compile? ...or let me know where I messed up, of course.
xing will send the patches for rk3399 together.
We hope the dtsi could be applied first but depends on clk driver, but it seems
not a good idea, we will resend dtsi patch after more drivers are applied.