Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/74] 4.4.5-stable review

[Kevin Hilman]

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 02:11:08AM -0800, kernelci.org bot wrote:
>> stable-queue boot: 205 boots: 14 failed, 190 passed with 1 offline (v4.4.4-74-gcc3ba9c14b31)
>> 
>> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-queue/kernel/v4.4.4-74-gcc3ba9c14b31/
>> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-queue/kernel/v4.4.4-74-gcc3ba9c14b31/
>> 
>> Tree: stable-queue
>> Branch: local/linux-4.4.y.queue
>> Git Describe: v4.4.4-74-gcc3ba9c14b31
>> Git Commit: cc3ba9c14b31161587ce85e9b5d642e730a2d0e8
>> Git URL: git://server.roeck-us.net/git/linux-stable.git
>> Tested: 47 unique boards, 13 SoC families, 18 builds out of 132
>> 
>> Boot Failures Detected: https://kernelci.org/boot/?v4.4.4-74-gcc3ba9c14b31&fail
>> 
>> arm:
>> 
>>     mxs_defconfig:
>>         imx23-olinuxino: 1 failed lab
>> 
>>     omap2plus_defconfig:
>>         omap4-panda: 1 failed lab
>> 
>>     multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_LKDTM=y:
>>         imx53-qsrb: 1 failed lab
>>         imx6dl-riotboard: 1 failed lab
>>         socfpga_cyclone5_socrates: 1 failed lab
>> 
>>     multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n:
>>         imx53-qsrb: 1 failed lab
>>         imx6dl-riotboard: 1 failed lab
>>         socfpga_cyclone5_socrates: 1 failed lab
>> 
>>     multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y:
>>         socfpga_cyclone5_socrates: 1 failed lab
>> 
>>     imx_v6_v7_defconfig:
>>         imx53-qsrb: 1 failed lab
>>         imx6dl-riotboard: 1 failed lab
>> 
>>     multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y:
>>         imx53-qsrb: 1 failed lab
>>         imx6dl-riotboard: 1 failed lab
>>         socfpga_cyclone5_socrates: 1 failed lab
>> 
>> Offline Platforms:
>> 
>> arm:
>> 
>>     mxs_defconfig:
>>         imx28-duckbill: 1 offline lab
>
> I really don't know what these mean, any chance you can distill these
> down to "all is fine", or "there is a problem with this arch" type
> emails?

All is fine.

These failures are are on newly added boards coming from a new lab and
they're failing in other trees also, so we'll ignore them for now and
check with the specific lab owner.

Kevin