Re: [RFC 5/7] wlcore: avoid fragile snprintf use

[Kalle Valo]

Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Appending to a buffer like this is not guaranteed to work (passing
> overlapping src and dst buffers to snprintf is undefined
> behaviour). The standard and safe idiom is to keep track of the
> current string length.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Should I take this or what's the plan?

-- 
Kalle Valo