Re: [PATCH 00/23] tracing: 'hist' triggers

From: Tom Zanussi
Date: Wed Mar 09 2016 - 10:04:48 EST


Hi Steve,

On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 09:44 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 12:54:40 -0600
> Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > This is v16 of the 'hist triggers' patchset.
> >
> > This version incorporates a couple changes suggested by Steve.
> >
> > Patch 1 can be merged into patch 8 from v13, 'tracing: Add lock-free
> > tracing_map'. Following the v13 suggestions, I made a couple changes
> > to the tracing map constants to clarify the field relationships, and
> > added a couple missing comments I noticed while at it.
> >
>
> Hi Tom!
>
> I tested this, played with it a little, and I think it's pretty much
> ready to go. But I'm very nervous about sending this to Linux-next this
> late in the current rc cycle. I would like this in next for a full
> cycle before sending it to Linus.
>
> Thus, I'm going to push everything up to but excluding:
>
> tracing: Add lock-free tracing_map
>
> The hist tree that I tested and played with is on my repo in
> ftrace/hist branch.
>
> I'll push this to linux-next after 4.6-rc1 is released, and then we can
> get it into the 4.7 merge window.
>
> Does that sound fine to you?
>

Yeah, it's been kicking around for a couple years now, so one more cycle
won't hurt. ;-) (and I do think it having it soak in linux-next for a
full cycle makes a lot of sense).

Thanks for all your review and testing!

Tom

> -- Steve