Re: [PATCH 0/3] net: macb: Fix coding style issues
From: David Miller
Date: Wed Mar 09 2016 - 15:26:52 EST
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 18:29:01 +0100
> On 9.3.2016 18:22, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 17:29:39 +0100
>>
>>> On 7.3.2016 18:13, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>>>> Le 07/03/2016 17:17, Moritz Fischer a écrit :
>>>>> Hi Nicolas,
>>>>>
>>>>> this series deals with most of the checkpatch warnings
>>>>> generated for macb. There are two BUG_ON()'s that I didn't touch, yet,
>>>>> that were suggested by checkpatch, that I can address in a follow up
>>>>> commit if needed.
>>>>> Let me know if you want me to split the fixes differently or squash
>>>>> them into one commit.
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm not usually fond of this type of patches, but I must admit that this
>>>> series corrects some style issues.
>>>>
>>>> So, I would like more feedback from Michal and Cyrille as these changes
>>>> may delay some of the not-merged-yet features or more important
>>>> work-in-progress on their side.
>>>>
>>>> On the other hand, if we all think it's a calm period for this macb
>>>> driver, we may find interesting to merge some "cleanup and style"
>>>> enhancements.
>>>
>>> Not a problem with merging cleanups in general. We have several out of
>>> tree patches but doesn't make sense to to wait.
>>> I wasn't in cc for the series but I don't like this change to be the
>>> part of cleanup series.
>>>
>>> mac = of_get_mac_address(np);
>>> if (mac)
>>> - memcpy(bp->dev->dev_addr, mac, ETH_ALEN);
>>> + ether_addr_copy(bp->dev->dev_addr, mac);
>>
>> Why? This is what we tell people to use.
>
> I would expect this as separate patch not the part of one huge cleanup
> patch which does just comment and space cleanups.
That is true.