Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 02/08/2016 08:06 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
I would agree, as long as the maintainers agree. We don't want to repeat
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 7:28 PM, MÃns RullgÃrd <mans@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Not very surprising either. The number of people using Linux on avr32
is probably approximately zero, and if anyone is, they're likely still
running 2.6.32 or thereabouts.
Once I tried up the topic about removal avr32 for good, but looks like
it wasn't a good time. Maybe now is better? It would really reduce a
burden on many drivers.
the h8300 experience.
So, are we going to agree that avr32 must be retired from next cycle?
P.S. I have no idea how to fix this "ârelocation truncated to fit:
R_AVR32_21Sâ", though I can test anything anyone propose.
I'd like to try fixing it before we delete anything. At the very least,
it's always a good idea to figure out exactly why it broke, just to be
sure it isn't a broader issue that has yet to manifest itself elsewhere.