Re: [PATCH] rcu: Remove some superfluous lines

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 05:41:46AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 09:49:04AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > I think you'll find this condition is superfluous, as the whole function
> > is under #ifdef of that same.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Right you are!  It got moved under that #ifdef in the process of merging
> the RCU, hotplug, and swait changes, and I failed to notice.  Good catch!
> 
> I will apply this to my tree once -rc1 comes out, as it will apply to
> -rcu at that point.
> 
> Or maybe we should remove the #ifdef and add IS_ENABLED() to the other
> functions under that #ifdef.  Thoughts?

I'd go with the #ifdef, its the conventional pattern.