Re: [PATCH] KVM: Remove redundant smp_mb() in the kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page()

[Xiao Guangrong]

On 03/11/2016 12:04 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 10/03/2016 16:45, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> > > > Compared to smp_load_acquire(), smp_mb() adds an ordering between stores
> > > > and loads.
> > >
> > > Here, the ordering is load-store, hence...
> >
> > Yes, this is why i put smp_mb() in the code. :)
>
> Here is a table of barriers:
>
>
>      '. after|                   |
> before '.   |    load           |    store
> __________'.|___________________|________________________
>              |                   |
>              |  smp_rmb          | smp_load_acquire
> load        |  smp_load_acquire | smp_store_release    XX
>              |  smp_mb           | smp_mb
> ____________|___________________|________________________
>              |                   |
>              |                   | smp_wmb
> store       |  smp_mb           | smp_store_release
>              |                   | smp_mb
>              |                   |
>
> Your case is the one marked with XX, so a smp_load_acquire() is
> enough---and it's preferrable, because it's cheaper than smp_mb() and
> more self-documenting.

Yes, you are right and thank you for pointing it out.