Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update

[Boris Brezillon]

Hi Thierry,

On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:54:38 +0100
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 08:34:19AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Thierry,
> > 
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > So just to summarize:
> > >
> > > * Add pwm_get_state(), pwm_apply_state(), pwm_get_args().
> > > pwm_get_state() initially returns 0 for duty cycle if driver doesn't
> > > support readout.
> > >
> > > * Re-implement pwm_get_period() (and maybe other similar functions)
> > > atop pwm_get_state() as you describe earlier in the thread.
> > >
> > > * Document pwm_get_period() (and maybe other similar functions) as deprecated.
> > >
> > > * Fix drivers for all current 2 users of PWM regulator to support
> > > hardware readout.
> > >
> > > * Update PWM regulator as you described earlier in the thread (Feb 23).
> > >
> > > * If PWM regulator is ever used on a new board whose PWM doesn't
> > > support hardware readout, the voltage will change at probe time.
> > >
> > >
> > > Did I get all that right?  Thanks!
> > 
> > Can you provide a "yes, you got that right" or a "no, you didn't
> > understand"?  That will unblock Boris, I think.
> 
> Sounds about right. Hopefully this will eliminate any objections that
> others had about the series.

Okay, I'll rework the series accordingly and send a new version soon.

Thanks,

Boris

-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com