Re: [PATCH RFC 09/22] block, cfq: replace CFQ with the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler

From: Linus Walleij
Date: Fri Mar 11 2016 - 09:54:02 EST

Next message: Javier Martinez Canillas: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] [media] exynos4-is: FIMC port parse should fail if there's no endpoint"
Previous message: Joonsoo Kim: "Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4)"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH RFC 09/22] block, cfq: replace CFQ with the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> We use blkj-mq for single queue devices as well, in fact most consumers
> are single queue. MMC is a prime candidate that hould move over soon.

OK we should do that with some before-and-after tests and see what
happens.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Next message: Javier Martinez Canillas: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] [media] exynos4-is: FIMC port parse should fail if there's no endpoint"
Previous message: Joonsoo Kim: "Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4)"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH RFC 09/22] block, cfq: replace CFQ with the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]