Re: linux-next: manual merge of the aio tree with the vfs tree

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Mon Mar 14 2016 - 03:35:47 EST

Next message: Joe Perches: "Re: [RFC PATCH V2] checkpatch: Check output format style of __func__ uses"
Previous message: Lu Baolu: "Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] usb: mux: add common code for Intel dual role port mux"
In reply to: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: linux-next: manual merge of the aio tree with the vfs tree"
Next in thread: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: linux-next: manual merge of the aio tree with the vfs tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

The aio changes have either been reviewed negatively or not at all. That
tree should be dropped.

Next message: Joe Perches: "Re: [RFC PATCH V2] checkpatch: Check output format style of __func__ uses"
Previous message: Lu Baolu: "Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] usb: mux: add common code for Intel dual role port mux"
In reply to: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: linux-next: manual merge of the aio tree with the vfs tree"
Next in thread: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: linux-next: manual merge of the aio tree with the vfs tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]