Re: [PATCH] rtc: s3c: Don't print an error on probe deferral

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello Joe,

On 03/14/2016 05:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 16:59 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> I don't think they make little sense now since even a non-native english
>> speaker like me can understand it :)
> 
> That's a non sequitur if ever I read one.
>

I was trying to be funny but it seems that I failed.
 
>> But yes, it's cryptic at the very least. That's the problem with long text
>> and the 80 char limit to make checkpatch.pl happy. I guess I can just move
>> the message a little bit even if that will make to not be properly aligned.
> 
> There's no issue with longer than 80 column lines
> for these messages.  checkpatch wouldn't complain.
> 

Great, I didn't know that checkpatch had an exception for the 80 column
rule. I'll post a v2 then.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America